The video discusses the tensions between the UK and Russia concerning the 2018 novichok attack which resulted in the death of a British woman, Dawn Sturgis. The UK accuses Russia of being behind the attack and involves a formal inquiry. The Russian ambassador refutes the claims, stating that Russia provided their side of the story in the past and believing in a proxy war led by the UK against Russia through Ukraine.

The discussion delves into the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, with tensions high between Russia and western nations. The Russian ambassador argues that the war continues due to Ukraine's resistance and lack of negotiations. He defends Russia’s alliances with countries like North Korea and Iran, indicating shared interests despite western perspectives labeling them as pariah states. Russia remains firm in its stance, dismissing the strain on its resources and economy.

Main takeaways from the video:

Please remember to turn on the CC button to view the subtitles.

Key Vocabularies and Common Phrases:

1. novichok [ˈnoʊ.vɪ.ˌtʃɑk] - (noun) - A group of advanced nerve agents developed by the Soviet Union in the 1970s and 1980s. - Synonyms: (nerve agent, chemical weapon, poison)

The inquiry into the shock novichok attack in Salisbury back in 2018 is a reminder of how relations between the UK and Russia went badly wrong.

2. proxy [ˈprɑːk.si] - (noun) - An agent or substitute authorized to act for another person or entity; often in warfare, a conflict instigated by opposing powers who do not fight against each other directly. - Synonyms: (intermediary, surrogate, representative)

Russia firmly believes that the UK government is waging aggressive War against Russia by the hands of Ukrainians. This is a proxy war led by the United Kingdom's government by providing lethal weapons with which the UK government is killing Russian soldiers and civilians.

3. capitulation [kəˌpɪtʃ.əˈleɪ.ʃən] - (noun) - The action of surrendering or ceasing to resist an opponent; the act of giving up. - Synonyms: (surrender, yield, submission)

The Kremlin talks about wanting peace, but peace on Russia's terms, which would amount to Ukraine's capitulation.

4. feeble [ˈfiː.bəl] - (adjective) - Lacking physical strength, especially as a result of age or illness; weak; failing to be effective. - Synonyms: (weak, frail, fragile)

They still continue to resist, but the resistance is more feeble and fable every day we are gaining more and more terrain.

5. pariah [pəˈraɪ.ə] - (noun) - A social outcast; a person, country, or organization that is despised or avoided by others. - Synonyms: (outcast, untouchable, undesirable)

Are you comfortable, as an experienced diplomat of many decades, with having to rely on support from pariah states like North Korea and Iran?

6. reciprocity [ˌrɛs.ɪˈprɒs.ɪ.ti] - (noun) - A mutual exchange of privileges or actions; the practice of exchanging things with others for mutual benefit. - Synonyms: (mutuality, exchange, interchange)

We are in favor of speediest political negotiated solution over there, but we do not feel a reciprocity.

7. narrative [ˈnær.ə.tɪv] - (noun) - A spoken or written account of connected events; a story or a particular way of explaining or understanding events. - Synonyms: (story, account, tale)

And in the Russian state media, the official narrative continues to be that the west is using Ukraine to wage war in Russia to try to destroy Russia.

8. doctrine [ˈdɒk.trɪn] - (noun) - A stated principle of government policy, mainly in foreign or military affairs. - Synonyms: (policy, rule, belief)

President Putin has never said about the nuclear retaliation. What he has said basically is that we are changing our doctrine.

9. sanctions [ˈsæŋk.ʃənz] - (noun) - Penalties or other means of enforcement used to provide incentives for obedience with the law, or rules; often used in international politics to change or control a country’s behavior. - Synonyms: (penalties, restrictions, embargoes)

International sanctions have not crashed the Russian economy.

10. optics [ˈɒp.tɪks] - (noun) - The way in which an event is perceived by the public, or the public impression it creates. - Synonyms: (perception, viewpoint, impression)

And what we see in the press, it is only one optics on the other side.

Russia's ambassador to UK appears to appears to laugh and dismiss Novichok inquiry - BBC News

Now then, we have talked a lot about the war in Ukraine in the last couple of years. A level of Russian aggression that took the west by surprise, with thousands upon thousands of lives being lost on both sides. But the inquiry into the shock novichok attack in Salisbury back in 2018 is a reminder of how relations between the UK and Russia went badly wrong. A poisoning on the UK soil of a former Russian spy that also took the life of an innocent British woman, Dawn Sturgis. She died after coming into contact with the nerve agent hidden in a perfume bottle. The UK has long believed it was ordered by the Kremlin that attacked and carried out by Russian agents. Well, Don Sturgis family want Vladimir Putin to be held accountable for what happened.

I put that request direct to the Russian ambassador on Friday, asking if Russia still continued to claim that it was nothing to do with them. There is a clear view that the truth from 250 British detectives, from the UK government, from the US government, from the French, the German, the Canadian governments, all of whom have said that Russia was behind this attack. Too many governments are involved. Do they really take advice of each other? It is so. This is nonsense, really. And we have. I really don't want to discuss it further because it has been explicitly explained during all these years. Five years has passed. We arranged a big press conference here. Many questions has been answered about that. So why to drag this history so long and to continue into this. We do not really understand.

The issue has been discussed and we did have an opportunity to provide all the answers. So why now? The reason for asking this now is that an official inquiry is underway into the fact that a British woman lost her life because of these poisonings. Now, the evidence is that the novichok was manufactured in Russia. The evidence is that two men. Forgive me if I could finish my question. The evidence is that two men traveling on Russian passports were behind this attack. Perhaps those two men should go to testify at the inquiry in order to clear their names. Should they? I don't think so. They are Russian citizens. Perhaps if we are speaking about the same personalities, they. As far as they recall, it's in old days already. But they have given the answers on the television, even performing on the television.

That's all right. Why don't they come and testify to the official inquiry that is taking place right now to clear it up? Because the fact is that the UK government does not believe what you're saying today. People listening to this will think that you are. Russia firmly believes that the UK government is waging aggressive War against Russia by the hands of Ukrainians. This is a proxy war led by the United Kingdom's government by providing lethal weapons with which the UK government is killing Russian soldiers and civilians. You think that we are at war with your country? I think that you are aggressive or you're waging a proxy war against Russia. We'll come to that in a moment.

But in terms of Salisbury, do you have any words for the family of Dawn Sturgis, the British woman who was innocent, who was killed? Perhaps when? Since it is at the very beginning, it's the third or fourth day of the listening of the hearings, which takes place Salisbury someplace. Then it will go to London. And what we see in the press, it is only one optics on the other side. It is just one side of the story that has been shown. I would appreciate very much that it will be two sides. Well, her family would like to hear the Russian side.

In fact, her family would like Vladimir Putin to take part in the inquiry. I hardly believe that President Putin will go to Britain just to testify, to do something. But the family have asked for that. If it's not possible for that to take place. Do you today, Ambassador, have any words for that grieving family? I don't know. I have never met this family, so I am not involved discussions with them or something else. So if someone has died, of course we are concerned about that.

When we last spoke about 18 months ago, you told us of Russia's superior might. You said it was 16 times bigger than Ukraine and that you would prevail. If that was true, that Russia would prevail, why haven't you won yet? And this is what is happening during what I have said. It is absolutely true. The. But the war is still going on. You have heard Zelenskyy yesterday he was desperate. He fully understands that he is losing not only terrain, but he is losing the conflict.

I wouldn't say the war, but I wouldn't say that they are going to surrender tomorrow. They still continue to resist, but the resistance is more feeble and fable every day we are gaining more and more terrain. Half of what has been captured by Ukrainian troops has been already liberated. The other half will be liberated soon. The end of this phrase will mean the end of Ukraine until it takes. What do you mean by that? By that it will be. The defeat is in view.

The defeat of the whole course is in view. I wouldn't say that it's happened tomorrow or the day after tomorrow. What is worrying us is that there is no peace plan in the peace plan. Presented by Zelensky, he do not want to peace negotiations. He continues to ask for more and more NATO, European Union assistance, well, defense packages, anything, but nothing about negotiations at all. Well, he's been very clear. He won't negotiate with you. He won't negotiate with us. Fine.

Then he will lose more and more terrain. Are you comfortable, as an experienced diplomat of many decades, with having to rely on support from pariah states like North Korea and Iran? I wouldn't say that it is for you, perhaps it is a pariah states for us. It's normal people. We have been friends and we have a lot of common interests with North Korea and with Iran itself. It is simply people, just the governments. And although if they are taking different position and different views, it doesn't mean that we should disregard a relationship with them.

Yes, we did strike an agreement which has actually a repetition of an older agreement with North Korea or anything bad. We do not see it. So this is a country which is our neighbor. We have a lot of tourists, by the way, in the North Korea right now, as well as in Iran. And they do. They are on the map. They do exist and no one should ignore them. They are normal countries.

You say those countries without democracy prisoners, as well as China people, for instance, as well as Vulcan island as well as all the others. These are simple people whose rights we have to protect. Isn't the truth here that you and Vladimir Putin are both sitting in grand luxury, refusing to budge while thousands of civilians, Russians and Ukrainians are suffering as a result of this conflict which your government could bring to an end, and yet you persist with it? Well, stop the flow of armaments to the Ukraine and the conflict will be resolved the day after tomorrow. Is there any chance that Vladimir Putin to stop the armament supplies?

Is there any chance that Vladimir Putin will budge? Because it may be that he will put such strain on his country that in the end it will be impossible for him to hold on? Laura, it's a wrong assumption that there is a big story strain economically on Russia. Russia lives with its own absolutely normal life. We are in favor of speediest political negotiated solution over there, but we do not feel a reciprocity. No one, neither Ukrainian president nor his government, neither officially, none of the NATO government are speaking about negotiations. They're very clear that they believe it was an illegal invasion on your side. So you know that they don't want to negotiate. Can I ask you what do you want? That we will. That we will finish it unilaterally? No, it will not happen.

So we Are not going to just say, okay, since tomorrow we do not shoot each other. We want to settle this conflict forever and on a normal terms. The terms that will guarantee Europe, US and Ukraine normal security guarantees. Does this suffering in this war ever keep you awake at night? Ever what keep you awake at night? No one likes the war, so no one likes the war. And we stand for as quickest diplomatic and political settlement and we expect the same from the others. But does this suffering and the loss of life as it drags on, does it ever cause you to stay awake at night? You are repeating your questions.

You didn't answer them. Does it ever cause you to stay awake at night? Yes. Well, sometimes I feel like I expect and I anticipate the end of it, the quickest end of it. And I hope that it will end sometime. I do not. No one would like to drag it for a long time. Last month President Putin issued a threat saying that any Western advanced Western missiles, any Western attack could result in nuclear retaliation.

Not exactly. This is not exactly what he has said. So what is the nature of President Putin's view on when a nuclear retaliation might be justified? President Putin has never said about the nuclear retaliation. What he has said basically is that we are changing our doctrine. In a sense, it was a thing that is connected with a discussion which is still underway here about an option of missiles. Long range missiles can strike Russian territory.

However, the head of NATO has said so far, President Putin may have made these kinds of threats, but NATO has been able to call his bluff. It's a sign of weakness to make these kinds of threats, isn't it? Not a sign of strength. It is a bluff. It is the pronunciation by the chief of NATO that's a bluff. Because we are going to protect our security interests and our security with all means that are in our disposal. And believe me, there are lots of them. Ambassador Kellen, thank you very much indeed for speaking to us today.

Thank you very much. Thank you very much for your questions. Well, that's the official worldview from the Kremlin's man in London. Let's now get something of a reality check from the BBC's man in Moscow, Steve Rosenberg. Morning from Moscow. Laura, I tell you what feels strange here right now. On the one hand, Russia is waging war on Ukraine. Huge numbers of Russian soldiers have been killed. And just 300 miles or so from here, Ukrainian troops are occupying a chunk of Russian territory.

And yet if you go into the streets of Moscow, everything feels normal. It looks normal, right? The buses are running on time. The shops are still full of goods. International sanctions have not crashed the Russian economy. And I think in many ways the authorities here have managed to normalize the war. In Russian public perception, it's become routine, something going on in the background, and many Russians just try to put the war completely out of their minds and get on with life.

The Kremlin talks about wanting peace, but peace on Russia's terms, which would amount to Ukraine's capitulation. And in the Russian state media, the official narrative continues to be that the west is using Ukraine to wage war in Russia to try to destroy Russia, when in reality it was Russia that launched the full scale invasion of Ukraine. This was President Putin's decision, by the way. In a couple of days time, he'll be hosting two dozen heads of states, including from India. And China will be covering that. And I'm sure he'll try to use that summit to show that attempts to isolate him on the world stage have failed. But problems are building. Inflation's a problem, the shortage in the labor markets a problem.

I've talked about military casualties, and the government here is having to spend increasingly large sums of money to try to recruit volunteers to fight in Ukraine. And you should definitely keep an eye out for Steve Rosenberg's reporting from that summit in the next few days.

Russia, United Kingdom, International Relations, Politics, Technology, Global, Bbc News