In this interview, the focus is primarily on understanding how the development and application of AI, particularly chat GPT, are reshaping writing and communication. The discussion explores how AI-driven tools are becoming essential general-purpose aids for various tasks, shifting traditional methods of writing and thinking to more dynamic and generative processes. By involving AI like chat GPT in daily workflows, users can amplify creativity and streamline communication.

The dialogue addresses how new technologies are influencing learning and the essence of creativity. There's an emphasis on how AI can intersect with human thought to expand possibilities. It examines what makes effective communication and writing in the modern age while contemplating how AI tools can either foster better thinking or contribute to a decline in conventional skills.

Main takeaways from the conversation:

Please remember to turn on the CC button to view the subtitles.

Key Vocabularies and Common Phrases:

1. compression [kəmˈprɛʃən] - (noun) - The action of simplifying or condensing information while maintaining its integrity. - Synonyms: (condensation, reduction, compacting)

compression is like the secret to intelligence, and that was like, I had to meditate on that for a long time, I'm sure.

2. juxtaposition [ˌdʒʌkstəpəˈzɪʃən] - (noun) - The fact of placing two things side by side, especially for comparison or contrast. - Synonyms: (contrast, comparison, adjacency)

I find it interesting that there's a juxtaposition between words being more important on the input and then moving away from words with the output.

3. malleable [ˈmæl.i.ə.bəl] - (adjective) - Easily influenced, shaped or altered. - Synonyms: (pliable, adaptable, flexible)

There's also something special about text. Yeah, for sure. Searchable, malleable.

4. multimodal [mul-ti-mo-dal] - (adjective) - Involving or using more than one mode or method. - Synonyms: (multi-method, versatile, combinatorial)

And you'll have multimodal input as well as output, but we are very finely evolved to use language.

5. visceral [ˈvɪsərl] - (adjective) - Relating to deep inward feelings rather than to the intellect. - Synonyms: (emotional, instinctive, gut)

That was like a real, like, what have we done? Moment. I was like, visceral in a way that, you know, I just hadn't.

6. iterative [ˈɪtəˌreɪtɪv] - (adjective) - Involving repetition or recurrence to achieve a desired outcome. - Synonyms: (repetitive, cyclic, recurrent)

I try to figure out how to explain it to myself or to somebody else. So I think it's just like, it is a super powerful thinking tool. I write things down for myself or for the most, and for private groups the second most, and public at this point, very rarely.

7. prose [prəʊz] - (noun) - Ordinary form of written or spoken language without metrical structure. - Synonyms: (text, language, composition)

I think that to give you a little bit more credit, maybe the purple prose isn't your gift, but a piece like how to be successful really influenced me.

8. synergy [ˈsɪn.ər.dʒi] - (noun) - The interaction of elements that when combined produce a total effect that is greater than the sum of the individual elements. - Synonyms: (collaboration, unity, teamwork)

And the only thing you push on, you should only push on a few of these things in writing, in business, whatever. I really, really believe in this principle.

9. unconstrained [ˌʌnkənˈstreɪnd] - (adjective) - Not restricted or bound by limitations. - Synonyms: (unrestricted, free, limitless)

He thinks about the world in this sort of deeply unconstrained way he has.

10. sloganeering [ˌsloʊɡəˈnɪərɪŋ] - (noun) - The use of slogans or catchphrases in communication, often used in political or social contexts. - Synonyms: (motto crafting, catchphrase use, slogan creation)

There's sort of the sloganeering. There is a good tagline. There's also the depth.

I interviewed the Creator of ChatGPT

Someone is going to build a great tool to write in a new way, and that will expand the realm of human possibility. How do you use chat GPT every day? I really do use it as a general purpose tool. Every few months I find new ways to use it. Have you read the paper? Driven by compression. Progress. compression is like the secret to intelligence, and we're going to go figure out how to compress as much knowledge as possible. That's what we're going to make. AI. If you were to write a book, what would it be about? Almost all business books are terrible, right? There's like three good ideas in 300 pages. What a reader wants is three good ideas in one page. You wanted to be a novelist. That astounded me, but only for the romantic life of it. Smoking in a cafe in Paris. Yeah, you can still do that. I could. Probably not the path my life was gonna go, but I could. You ever wonder how Sam Altman takes notes, thinks about annual planning things about sabbaticals, what he's gonna actually work on, how he chose to focus on AGI? You ever wonder what he learned from Paul Graham? Well, those are the things that we talk about in this episode, and we get answers. Now, you'll see this conversation is in two parts. So the first part we record in early 2024, the second part in late 2024. And then this interview is just those two things combined and brought together.

Now, Sam, I want to begin with how has knowledge of LLMs changed how you think about writing and communication? I mean, I think we are going to all, not all of us. I think many of us are going to write in a different way in the future. I don't mean people are just going to use LLMs to write stuff for them, because one of the strangest things that I think happens is when people put a few bullet points into an LLM, have it generate a nice email, send it to somebody else, and then they summarize it on the other end, because we just can't agree that we just want the bullet points back and forth. And there's still this societal nicety. But someone is going to build, probably somebody already has built a first version of this. Like a great tool to write in a new way, where you have this thing that is not expanding your bullet points, but is helping you discover new things in the idea space. And that's awesome. That's what computers do at their best, right. They are a tool that help you do things you otherwise couldn't do. I've always thought it was strange how we've had this tools for thought idea for decades, and yet the vast majority of the way people write is they open up Microsoft Word and they have no aid from a computer. Really. It's just like a typewriter.

Tell me if this is baseless or accurate or where on the spectrum it is, but I find it interesting that there's a juxtaposition between words being more important on the input and then moving away from words with the output. Sora Dolly. I think words are going to be a huge part of how we communicate with computers, how we program computers. And natural language is kind of the interface to computers that people want. I think. I think that's been Sci-Fi predicted that for a long time. But I think a big part of the revolution of chat GPT was you could just talk to a computer in plain English and get it to do all these things. It won't be the only way we want to interact with computers, of course, and you'll have multimodal input as well as output, but we are very finely evolved to use language. There's also something special about text. Yeah, for sure. Searchable, malleable. There is a reason that this has been such a part of, like, to imagine humanity, human culture, without language. It's like, it seems impossible. I can't do it. And even text itself. There's a rigor to text. There's a rigor to thinking in text, for sure. Yes, I get it, because you can point to specific words and sentences that you disagree with, rather than just the overall vibe. So if we're having a conversation, I can't remember the exact word that you said, but if there's a transcription, I can say it was this, that I really liked this, that. I think we can make some minor changes to.

How should chat GPT be changing how we teach our kids how to write? I don't think we know yet what the writing of the future, the process is going to look like. I would bet it's just a safe baseline, that it's not going to change all that much. I think we will have new tools that let people write in different ways and hopefully get more idea, refinement and generation out of the process. But this thing that people say of no one's ever going to learn to write anymore, because now that's not why people really write in the first place. Like the kind of writing that you can just the kind of thing you would do by having Jacu PT go write your kind of essay for english class. That's not real.

That's not what this is about anyway. And if Chachi but can help people do a writing like activity and get higher quality thinking out of it, that's wonderful. Tell me about that. Literally, if we believe that part of the value, a big part of the value of writing is to clarify your own thinking, and we can have new tools that help you do that better than before, that'll be a big win. What I think of chat GPT as raising the returns to is the initial seed, the big bang moment of an idea. And this is a way that I like using chat GPT is I know that I have a distinct idea of chat GPT disagrees with me. And then once I have that idea, if I can clarify it in some sort of way, then chat GPT can help me find examples and stories, things that amplify and help to grow the initial seed that I've planted. Totally.

I think I try to watch people, like very different walks of life use Chachi pt, and it's always illuminating. So I watched two students use it to kind of like, help with their homework, do their homework, to be honest, recently, and one of them basically just put in their thing and wrote their whole essay. And I was appalled because I kind of knew that that was a theoretical thing that people were doing at significant volume or whatever, but you hear about it, but to watch someone just do that and then get an essay that was bad but passable out of it was. That was like a real, like, what have we done? Moment. I was like, visceral in a way that, you know, I just hadn't. I'd never seen someone do it before. And then I watched someone else use it in a very different, more interactive way to try to do something more like what you're talking about, which is like, I have this idea, I can't quite articulate it. I'm kind of stuck. Let me get unblocked and let me generate a bunch more ideas. And the thing that came out of that was far better than I think anybody would have done on their own.

And I was reflecting a lot on that and the first question was like a bad question, like, if you can just put something in and get a super interesting, or I thought, not a super passable response. I think we're just asking people to do the wrong thing. Whereas if it's something that gets them to want to think about a question differently and use the tool to help them get somewhere they wouldn't have gotten on their own, that's really interesting. How do you use chat GPT every day? I used to only use it for a few things, and both chat GPT has gotten better and I figured how to use it more. And so the cool thing now is I really do use it as a general purpose tool. And I hope that a few years from now, when you ask that, I'll say I use it for most things that I do. Like every few months, I find new ways to use it, new ways to incorporate. It's obviously still terribly integrated into most people's workflows, but that's just going to get better and better.

When you're talking to friends, you're like, you should use chat GPT for this. What are the themes that you're telling them to do? I mean, the thing that I hear about from my friends that they love it for the most is like, computer programming help in some way or other. And the number of people who say that's like, transformed my life. I mean, like, it's very gratifying to hear. It's a lot of fun. Like, there are other things where people say it's like, change the way my kids learn, or teachers say, change the way it teaches. That's great too. And then there's like, incredible examples with healthcare, the way people use this for creative work. But I, the programming one is, like, near and dear to my heart. Many of my friends are programmers, so I hear about that a lot. Email? Yeah, you do a lot of writing by email and you've.

I do a lot of, like, very short email. Like, I do a lot of like seven word emails. And how has chat GPT helped you with that? Um, it's super good at summarizing long emails that, like, most long emails, honestly, I just stop and I don't even read. But if I have to read one, it's super good at like, chat GBT's ability to effectively summarize long pieces of content, like a really long thread or whatever. Very impressive. Yeah, it was just. I got a tour of the library here. Yeah, that's a cool space, by the way. Nice job. I like that space a lot. It's beautiful. Thank you. And I saw the enchirto on the Wall by Nassim Taleb, and he says that basically, the definition of a good book is one that can't be summarized, and maybe there's an equivalent for GPT.

There's a really interesting. There's a really interesting thing there, which is that at some sense, it took me like years to really understand this, but Ilya would always say that what these models are really about is compression, and we're going to go figure out how to compress as much knowledge as possible, and that's how we're going to make AI. compression is like the secret to intelligence, and that was like, I had to meditate on that for a long time, I'm sure. I still don't fully understand it, but there's something deep there. I was talking to your assistant, she said that you think very clearly, you're like a man of few words, but when you say something, it's really. You're clear on what you want, and you've really crystallized your message.

I guess the part of that that resonates is I do try to get at the essence of a problem, and I definitely don't like when other people communicate unclearly. I thought it was really interesting in your conversation with Joe Hudson how you spoke about the way that you've released anxiety from your life. How has that change in your internal state shown up in your thinking? I don't remember who said this, but someone. I don't remember if this is a friend or a famous quote, but someone said, most people can't even let themselves think the interesting thoughts, much less say the interesting ideas. And I think there is something about the world that has gone horribly wrong there. And I'm sure having background anxiety running is a process, makes it harder to think new thoughts and to focus. For sure. If you're like a bundle of anxiety and you have an inner monologue spinning you in all sorts of different directions, it's hard to really sit down and focus.

But if you're constantly self critical, if you're constantly saying, well, what will other people think about this? I think a lot of people have. I've heard people say things like, well, that might be an interesting idea, but I would feel embarrassed or foolish to even tell people that I was thinking about it or working on it. If you can't even let yourself go pretty far down the path of exploring the idea before you worry about what other people are going to think about it. That seems bad, this idea that you have around. People spend so much time trying to think about how to be more productive, but you're like, hold on, hold on, hold on. Lets talk about how to really think about what were going to work on in the first place. How does writing help you do that? First of all, I strongly agree that if you have a choice between spending some effort thinking about what to work on versus how to be a little bit more productive in this new method or that new method, you should have a very high bar for doing anything but thinking about what to work on. I think thats just a higher, higher impact thing most of the time.

Of course, that doesn't work all the time. At some point you actually have to go execute. But I often see people who I think are really talented work super hard, are super productive, just not spend much time, or surprisingly often not really spend any time at all in a meaningful way thinking about what they're going to work on. And I think that's the high order bit. That's part one in terms of writing as a way to do that. I think of writing as sort of like externalized thinking. I still, if I have a very hard problem or if I feel a little bit confused about something, have not found anything better to do than to sit down and make myself write it out, write out how I'm thinking about it, what I think somebody should be, try to figure out how to explain it to myself or to somebody else. So I think it's just like, it is a super powerful thinking tool. I write things down for myself or for the most, and for private groups the second most, and public at this point, very rarely.

What are the different parameters of clear communication? There's sort of the sloganeering. There is a good tagline. There's also the depth. The idmas. Yeah, actually, I think clear communication is very much less important and very much downstream of actually clear thinking. So if you know what you're going to do and if you've figured out how to reduce that to the essence of why it's a good idea, what the plan is going to be, what the priorities are going to be, then communicating clearly about that is not so hard. But getting clear about the actual ideas is really hard. And so I think unclear communication is a symptom of unfocused thinking. For the most part. Napoleon, he has a line about the importance of clear directives, clear communication. Because when you're on the battlefield, you need to be able to articulate things simply and have alignment for the team. Lots of similarities with what you're saying.

I mean, I don't think that's just Napoleon. I think that, as I understand it, I haven't studied a lot of military history, but that's a pretty common refrain that seems to have been borne out by history. But I also think that's born out in business. That clarity, speed, quality of execution, all LinkedIn. Of all the things that you've written, what are you most proud of? This is not false modesty. Truly, none of it. Writing is not my gift, and I'm okay with that. Like, writing is super valuable to me as a tool for thinking, for communicating internally with the. But there's nothing I am. I hope I will do things a bit like stand the test of time and matter to the world. It's not gonna be my writing, but that doesn't mean I don't get a lot of value out of it. I think that to give you a little bit more credit, maybe the purple prose isn't your gift, but a piece like how to be successful really influenced me. Thank you. I appreciate that. To make every next thing that you do be a footnote to what you've done before, that's a profound idea. Yeah.

I mean, I think. I hope that I will contribute some ideas to the world that matter again. I hope all of those matter much less than OpenAI does, but that's nice of you to say so. I genuinely appreciate it. What got you to start writing the personal blog? I wanted to practice writing. I had this sense. I had watched Paul Graham write and he's an amazing writer. I never had any aspirations that I was going to be anything like that, but I had seen how powerful it was for helping startup founders and for getting to invest in good startup founders. So I wanted to try to get good at it. I'm not a naturally gifted writer, but I believe with practice, anybody, people can get good at a lot of things. I wanted to continue doing the thing that seemed to work so well for YC, getting good founders. But honestly, it wasn't. It's not my calling in life. I don't really do it anymore. You wanted to be a novelist. That astounded me. I did, but only for the romantic life of it. Not that I thought I was ever going to be a good writer.

It just seemed like this very cool thing to sit smoking in a cafe in Paris. You can still do that I could. I could. Probably not the path my life is going to go down, but I could. So it turned out I'm not a very good writer, and I'm not going to be a blogger, and that's okay. But I am still very happy with the experiment because I learned that I can, like, write for myself to clarify my own thinking, and that has been super powerful. Even the ability to, like, write a message, to, like, explain to a team what a plan is and why we're going to do it, I think doing that in writing versus doing that in a meeting is often very powerful. Have you done that recently? It's like if we're starting a new project or if we're putting together some sort of, like, plan that we're going to execute on. Forcing myself to write it down rather than just, like, sit in a meeting and let it spitball around has been very good.

Do you have a format of sorts? No, no. I mean, I try to, like, keep it under. I don't think long is good. Yeah. So I try to keep it short, but beyond that, no real constraints. Tell me about your just communication lessons that you've learned from Peter Thiel. He is so distinct in the way that he communicates. I know you've spent a lot of time with him, especially early in your career. He's an amazing communicator, and one thing that he does super well is he comes up with these very evocative, very short statements that really stick in your brain, and I don't know how to do that. I don't really know anybody else who does that like he does, but he has very interesting things to say and very interesting ways to say them. And most people, you're lucky to get one or the other. He is like a very rare combination of both. It's super impressive.

What do you think contributes to that? He thinks about the world in this sort of deeply unconstrained way he has. I mean, the first thing anybody would say about him is he is a truly brilliant, original thinker, and that's just rare. There's a boundlessness about your thinking that really stands out. I feel like you have that same sort of lack of constraint. I think he's more of a, like, here is this totally. Here is a totally different view on something that no one else has ever expressed and now sounds like, obviously, at least interesting and often obviously correct. And I think my view of the world is often more like, can we just do more like, we have this, like, vector. Can we push on it harder? Is that in the David Dorch sense of, like, everything is possible, that's not limited by the constraints of physics. Yeah. And also that there's not enough people don't to tie it back to Peter.

I remember a long time ago, someone asked him, what was your biggest investor mistake ever? And everybody expected him to say something like, well, I invested in this company, put all this money, and it blew up. And he said, the biggest mistake, I don't know if it's b or c, but the biggest mistake ever, let's say, was not investing in a series B of Facebook. And that is the kind of mistake I try not to make. So I'm like a big believer and find what is working and go aggressively after it. Ideas are such a power law, and it's about finding that core thing and just doubling, tripling down on that. Yeah. I think that the really good ideas are rare, and when you find one, you should quadruple down on it. And the only thing you push on, you should only push on a few of these things in writing, in business, whatever. I really, really believe in this principle.

And I mean, I think this is why, like, all business, almost all business books are terrible, right? There's like three good ideas and 300 pages, and what a reader wants is three good ideas on one page. Yeah. Did Paul Graham teach you anything specifically about writing? Yeah, mostly just by reading his essays. I think, like many other people, my introduction to the startup world and excitement about it came from reading PG's essays. He's like an unbelievable writer, and that was a topic of great interest to me and many other people. I think a whole generation of us copied PG in all of these ways. And so, although he was never like, let me teach you a class on how to write, I and others clearly took a lot of inspiration because I think he just does it in a style that resonates so much.

Clarity, precision, density. Like, if you go read average business book versus PG essay, it's like they're both business writing, but other than that, they're like different species. There's no posturing. He says interesting stuff. He says it clearly. He doesn't waste your time. Nothing feels fake. Pitching coming up with a story. How does writing factor into that? Uh, again, I think of writing as a tool to think more clearly or to get to the essence of something. And then hopefully when you're in a pitch meeting for your startup or whatever, you've already figured out how to get that down to the clear essence of it. And if you can, it's really dramatically different.

To be on the other side of a pitch if the person has gotten their thinking clear ahead of time or nothing. It's also a bonus if they're a clear communicator. And I can think of a few examples of people who I think are exceptionally clear thinkers and horrible communicators. But it's rare. I had to sit here earlier, as you were talking about that, and think. And so if someone can get their thinking clear before a pitch, then they can get across to you what they're trying to do. And there are a lot of people who can do this without writing, but I often find that writing is really, really helpful, and I often find that there are these ideas that I think I'm super clear on. And then I try to make myself write down, like a one page summary, and I was like, oh, I didn't really understand that in the first place.

Do you do a lot of Google Docs, exchanges with friends? I used to. I used to like all of life. It's just been in this, like, weird, through the looking glass past year and a half or whatever it's been, but not even that much since chatgpt launched. All of the normal hobbies of life pretty much have gotten attenuated. When you were doing that, how did it help? What did you ask for? Be like, I'm thinking about this. I'm thinking about doing this thing. I'm thinking about this idea just because it's interesting. What's the next step? Or tell me where I'm wrong? And you can do a lot of that over dinner parties and make a lot of progress. You can host friends for a weekend and talk about something a lot and make a lot of progress. But there is something about the process of trying to crystallize it onto a sheet of paper that has to be internally consistent, that doesn't let you hide from the weak points.

The constraint I like to give people is it needs to be short enough that you can send it to me in a screenshot, like a mobile phone screenshot. Not for everything, but I like that. I personally think that's maybe too constraining for some important ideas, even though I directionally super agree with you that short is critical. How much of your own writing the inspiration is born from conversation? A lot. But it kind of comes in as this jumble of ideas, and then writing is helpful because it. I think of conversation as this very generative process, and then you've got to grind it down to the essence. And that is best done sitting in front of a big monitor with no one else around, the image of tangled headphones came into my mind. Interesting.

For me, the image is much more like grinding down rocks than, than untangling something because it's more like a process of removing than untangling. And when you have all these slightly different ideas banging against each other, you kind of end up with the right core. If you were to write a book, what would it be about? I mean, a lot of times people say, hey, this AI think seems really important. Can you recommend me a book to read? And I kind of think about it and say, no, not really. So I think I would try to write the book for the people that ask what they should read about AI. And I think I would start with, here is the historical context of other technological revolutions. Why this one will be similar, why itll be different. Heres how the technology actually works.

Heres what is possible right now. Heres how this is going to impact your life this year. Heres the range of things that might be possible in five years and how it might impact your life then. And then if we really kind of let ourselves dream out 100 years, here's like what this means for all of us. And if I was your editor and I was like, sam, what is the biggest thing that people are missing right now? What would your answer be? Well, that's why I'm not going to write the book. I haven't had time to, like, think about that, and I don't think I will anytime soon. Where'd the all lowercase thing come from? I mean, I was like, I lived online as a kid and that was just, I don't know. I stopped using the shift key.

I do it if I'm still, if I'm writing something that feels like a school paper. I actually wrote something that I may do as a blog post, but it's like super long. It's like 20 pages. It's way too long. And I may just not have time to edit it down, but it was still interesting to write. But for something like that, I still capitalize it perfectly. So it's still in there somewhere. I like that. I may not have time to edit it down. There's something about that. It's really the editing that takes work. Yeah, for sure. I heard a nice line from David Ogilvy. He said, I'm a terrible writer, but I'm a great editor. That's a real skill. That's very tough to do, especially on your own stuff.

Do you get help with editing? Is that something that happens in Google Docs? Here, or how do you think about it? The things that are written just for an internal document, those don't really get edited. I write it once, maybe I read it once, have extra time and just send it out. But for internal coordination, where I think writing is super valuable, that's not like getting edited for publication. Internal coordination. Why do you use those words? Oh, if there's a bunch of teams that have to agree on what we're doing, I think having a written document, we are a document heavy culture in that sense. I think that's a good thing. Is that document heavy culture something that you got from Matt Macharide? No, that predated him. Predated him. Did YC have that? No, actually that's interesting. I think it's probably something about the academic culture of researchers that started it here.

In what ways did people's thinking reveal themselves through the writing of YC apps? The biggest thing that I took away most of the time is how rare clarity of expression in a YC application is. And it's rare, even though we say like, this is really important, and it seems obvious that that's what you should try to do. But I found on the whole that people who did not express themselves clearly in a YC application did not run the company in a clear way, did not explain to the team what they were doing, did not explain to investors, to customers everything else, what they were doing in a clear way. And that is a very hard way to have a chance at success for a company. So much of your job as a founder or anyone leading any kind of company is like evangelist in chief, and it's hard to be an effective evangelist without clear communication.

When you were at y combinator, you had a big initiative of open sourcing knowledge around a course, and you wrote a book called the Startup playbook. I would say I wrote like a pamphlet, but sure, okay, you wrote a 50 page book, but tell me about why you did that and the process of writing the book. I think getting the knowledge out about how to do startups is just like a clear net win for the world. It's nothing. The most important part of what YC does, like the one on one mentoring, support the network, that's all more important. But putting the knowledge out there is, I think, a good and easy thing to do.

And what is something that you learned while running YC that you feel like really influences the way that you run OpenAI? A big part of YC was just like encouraging founders to be more ambitious and to like kind of go after what they believed in. I think there's a lot of that in writing the company, too. What is something that you're excited to do with your writing with GPT that you can't do? Now, the thing that I have been thinking about is how can I use chaigbt to just like, make writing feel higher volume and lower stakes? Like how if I have to go write a ten page thing, that still feels like a huge thing to have to go do, and there's a lot of activation. I just have to write wait and time in the right mood, and then I have hours of uninterrupted focus.

And if using chat GPT, and I haven't figured this out yet, but I've been thinking about it, can somehow mean it's the kind of thing I do when I'm in an Uber for 15 minutes, because it just makes the activation energy that low. That'd be very cool. How can GPT amplify different personalities? One of the things I like to use it for is, hey, rewrite this in the style of Amer toles or Tyler Cowan. How can GPT continue to do that? Well, future versions of GPT will be very capable of that. What the fair thing to Tyler Cowan is in that case, we're trying to figure out. So it's not an obvious question, but for sure, what everybody agrees on is there can be many personalities that are not based on real people, and that's a cool thing to have.

And the fact that you can have, let's call them Personas, you can have like Cha Chi PTA, remix things in different Personas, I think that'll be helpful in the creative process. The thing that I hope for more than anything else out of chat GPT and future versions, is that it will be a tool that lets us do things we just couldn't do before. Think of ideas we just couldn't have before, be more creative than we could be before. And this is kind of the arc of technology, but I think this is going to be a particularly great example of it.

Creativity, not limited by skills, but by the ability to think of the idea in the first place. Not even that if these tools can help you think of the idea, but you've got to be a great curator. I don't know exactly what it's going to be like, but I do know people are going to get very good at using the tool like they do with any new tool, and that will expand the realm of human possibility.

One of the things that I really admire about you is how deliberate you are about thinking about what to work on. And I'm curious how you thought about your choice to work on AGI and what that process of envisioning that one thing that you were going to focus on was all about. Yeah, process is the right word for it, right? All these things sort of start as these, like, almost jokes. Not quite a joke, but like a sort of like, somewhat ridiculous idea. Now, working on AGI seems like the obvious only decision for me, at least. But at the time, it seemed like a pipe drain. But I think ideas in general are very fragile. Good ideas, the best ideas are extremely fragile. And there is an unbelievable amount of value in figuring out a setup, a method, whatever you want to call it, for not killing very fragile, but potentially very great ideas. This comes down to how you think about it, what your process to make a decision is. It comes down to who you surround yourself with.

I think a particular kind of toxicity to avoid are the people who are so smart, they understand why every great idea is bad. But I think in the very early days, the main thing is not to accidentally kill good ideas. So tell me about fragility and how writing factors into this. The thing that is most important to me personally about writing is externalized thinking and organization, magnification, whatever you want to call it, of vague ideas. I find it astonishing how much writing just for yourself. Sometimes for a small group of other people you're exploring an idea with, but mostly writing just for yourself, helps clarify what you actually think, helps sharpen stuff in a way that for me, and I think for a lot of other people, is somehow impossible to do. Just like thinking carefully on a long hike, like in your head. Yeah. It's harder to hide really messy thinking when you have to actually write it down and stare at it.

So tell me more about the process as you thought about your plan in the early days of OpenAI. In terms of focusing on this, what was the final output of that process where you said, let's do it? I do remember intermediate stages where it was like, talk to a bunch of people, have all these ideas, write out, okay, here's what we're going to do. Here's our plan. You would write some of those down and it would be like very obvious to you immediately, like, okay, this actually makes you feel it or you think it through. And when you stare at it, it's one thing to have a couple of beers with some friends and say, we're gonna build AGI. And it's another to say, like, okay, here's a full, cohesive plan for what it's gonna look like. Make some of the bullshit fall away. So many of those we'd write out as we were thinking through the different things we could do and how we would. It was going to be an organization. You know, we all going to go join some university research lab. Like that helped get rid of some of the silliness. And again, now it all seems so obvious that this feels weird to even say because, like, of course this is what we're going to do, right? But at the time, it was deeply non obvious or a lot of other people would have been doing it. That would be sort of my, like, evidence point for it. And then eventually, if you write something down that looks like, credible enough, you send it around to other people, they have the same experience. They might rewrite it, they might edit it, but they also kind of say, all right, when I have to stare at this in black and white, it's a little different. I'm a big believer in getting input from lots and lots of people, especially on hard questions of what to go do in the broadest sense.

And now, as you do annual planning and you think in one, maybe three year timeframes, is that process the same? Different. Don't do this with as much rigor as I should. It hasn't been annual, but maybe every two years I've written a document for OpenAI called literally R plan. Nice. And the first one was like 25 pages, and that was like lots of hours of talking to people, getting feedback, but it was like a sharpening process to the whole thing. There was then one later that was like 15, there was then one that was like four. I believe we could do like a half page version now. And I think that's like a good. That's a great sign of progress. Yeah.

How much writing are you doing day to day now? Every weekend, I mean, every weekend I'll write something and usually share it with ten people internally or something. Just like, here's a thing I've been thinking about that we should do. I have been working on something I actually plan to publish, which is rare for me now about just sort of what the world looks like if we get AI driven abundance and why that's important. But it's like, it's a long way to go. As you think about how AI is going to change writing, you know, what are comparatively, what skills are going to be more valuable versus less valuable in a world where, like, AI can do lots of things for you, having great ideas, knowing what you want the AI to do, and AI can do anything is really important. Taste creation, like expert level, you know, like whatever it is that PG does that's going to be super valuable.

I love using chatgbt to help me write something. Especially like, as I've been trying to write this thing, if I get, like, stuck, it's a sort of like super thesaurus. If I just can't figure out how to phrase something, or I'm like struggling with something, or like, just can't get something to flow. But it's definitely not like gonna replace coming up with the ideas anytime soon. It's an incredible tool for writers. Like incredible tool for writers, but definitely not a writer, like a sparring partner, like a collaborator, like someone you can give like a subtask to. Yeah, that's a lot of how I use it is a lot of times I have a word that I'm struggling with and I'll say, give me ten words that would work in this sentence, and then I'll take the sentence, quote it, and then it'll give me the output. It's really good at that. Yeah.

How do you think that we should be training writers differently in a chat GPT world? I heard this story once. I don't know if it's true or not, but it was like some creative writing teacher. They would have these students come and first day or whatever, she'd give an assignment, which is write the first paragraph of your novel. And people would come in with all of the standard freshmen in college mistakes, way too many stretched metaphors, way too much flowery language. And then she'd go through this exercise of, I think, a standard one first, which is cut one metaphor from every page, cut one unnecessary word from every sentence, cut this, cut that, cut that. You take this ten page thing down and you cut it down to one page and it would not be so torturously overwritten. And then the class would read them and they would say, okay, what happened here? What's the?

And the answer was, there was no story at all. The instinct was, try to write this beautifully, whatever kind of satisfying to write thing. But it's no fun to read. The readers want a story. And the thing from this teacher is that we might teach people to write beautifully, but there's no interesting story. On the other hand, you have these sort of massively mass market successful. I don't even know what, like, I'll pick on like the Twilight books or something. Quite interesting story, horrible writing. Sure. And the question is, like, can we make it easier to get both and can we teach people how to use these tools?

Do you have a sense for how good chat GPT storytelling is? Like, if I turn on voice mode and read it to a kid, how much better is that versus mom? I think the storytelling is not yet very good, but I would expect it to get better. We're still at a place where the models are just generally improving so much. I mean, there's areas that we could push on that'd be better for storytelling, but if the model just gets a lot smarter and also if we train it to be better at storytelling, that will help. How do you do that? You show it a bunch of examples of what makes a good story and what makes a bad story, which I don't think is like magic. I think we really understand that. Well, now we just haven't tried to do that. Yeah.

When you're sitting down to write and you're thinking about creating a focused state, what is it that you're doing in your process to really create that? I used to think like, oh, I got to get in the perfect place and I got to set a time that I'm going to go to this coffee shop and put on my noise canceling headphones, and I'm going to be in writing mode. And now I will take any eleven minutes uninterrupted that I can get sitting in the back of a car, laying in bed, whatever it is. I mean, if I do have, like, if I had like, a perfect thing, it would be like, you know, Saturday morning with a cup of coffee and nothing scheduled. And that is great. Like, if I got to sit down and like, if I have to write like a long thing, I will try to set that up, but most of it happens in like, short chunks in the back of a car. You know what I use a lot is I use the voice feature. I take it and I ask it to just clean it up.

And I find chat GPT to be so helpful with that because I'm much more generative with my mouth than I am with my fingertips. Interesting. For me, it's the opposite. Really. Yeah. I'm convinced there's ideas I would never have sitting and talking with people that I just need to sit and type for. This is obviously a very common observation, but figuring out the right amount of being with people, talking, you know, getting exposed to, like, a lot of ideas, and then having some time alone to think, to write, to just sort of, like, do some deep work, whatever that is. I think obviously, this is a super important pattern to a lot of people. Definitely. To me, my sort of, like, roughly rough rhythm is I'm like, you know, in the office kind of nonstop all week. I have no time to think. It's just, like, kind of crazy packed. And then on the weekends, I have, like, long, quiet blocks, and I'm not really around people, and that cycle is very important to me. And is that fractal? Like, do you sometimes take a few weeks off or anything like that? I used to. I think that's really good.

When I've taken long chunks of time off, I would do a month of nonstop hanging out with people, and then a month of being in the woods, on the beach, whatever. That doesn't really happen anymore. Yeah. Do you take notes during the week that you reflect on, or is it just on your head? No, I'm a huge note taker. Oh, tell me about that. There's all these, like, fancy notebooks in the world. Yeah, you don't want those. You definitely want a spiral notebook, because one thing that's important is you can rip pages out frequently, and you also want it to lie, like, flat and open on the table. And if you, like, open pages, you want them to, like, you know, like, be able to lay like this, whatever. You definitely want to be able to, like, rip pages out. I'm a big believer of, like, I take a bunch of notes and then I clearly rip them out so I can look at multiple pages at the same time, and I can crumple them up and throw them on the floor, and I'm done.

When our house cleaner comes in on whatever, there's just these pile of crumpled papers that I'm typing my notes in or whatever on the floor. You definitely want a kind of paper that is good to write on, which is a feel thing, but most paper is terrible to write on. You want hard front and back to the notepad, and you also want something that can fit in a pocket. I was about to say that I think the uniball micro five pen is the best pen overall. But the muji 0.36 or 0.37 in dark blue ink is a very nice pen for other reasons. So those are the two I would use, but I think this kind of notebook and one of those two patents is the right answer. And how many notes you're writing per day on that thing? I go through one of these, like, every two or three weeks. Oh, wow. So you're taking a lot of. Well, you can see how much I've ripped out. Like this used to have, like, 100 pages. So that's how you think about it. So you're going to basically take the notebook and then you rip out the pages. You don't have completed notebooks?

I don't have completed notebooks. Wow. What inspired this? Where does this come from? Lots of trial and error, many kinds of notebooks, many pens, many different systems. This one's really good. Another thing I've been thinking about when it comes to the influence of AGI on creative mediums is just the competence with the written word is going up so much. And here's what I mean. There's. Now, with Sora, you can create videos using text as the input. You can do that with music, you can do that with images. And that's a big change in terms of the influence of writing on our world. Again, for me, writing is a tool for thinking, most importantly, and I don't think that's going anywhere. And so I think it's like, it's really important that people still learn to write for this reason, in the same way that even if there's going to be, like, less traditional coding jobs, coding is a great way to learn to think, too. You should still learn to code.

So when you say it's important that people learn to write, what does that mean? What it means to me is that I figured out this tool to think more clearly. Now, if there's a better way to think more clearly with AI, great. I would switch to that. Definitely not found that yet. A final question that we can close with is there's just a lot of people out there who are saying that AI is going to kill writing, and they're angry about it. And what do you make of that? I don't see any evidence whatsoever that AI seems to be killing writing. I mean, there's a lot of bad AI writing plastered over the Internet, and there's a lot of bad student assignments that have probably been written by aihdenkhdev. But I don't think anyone's serious. I don't think Paul Graham is sitting around being like, AI is gonna kill my writing here. I think it would have to be, like, full superintelligence. Before, I was like, okay, this is gonna replace human writing full stop. And we have much bigger issues to worry about at that point.

Even if that happened, let's say we have a system that can write better than a human. Do you think that the most popular novel of 2027 has a human name on it or not? Like a human writer on it or not? I think, yes, I think it does, too. When I finish a great book, the first thing I go do is like, I want to know about the writer. I want another life story. And I don't think I'll ever have that feeling to like AI writing. There is something about you read an incredible book and you kind of, you get to connect to a person even though you dont literally know them. You feel like you do and you feel like you have this important shared human experience, and that is like some significant percentage of the enjoyment of a great book to me. And I bet we keep doing that.

Artificial Intelligence, Innovation, Leadership, Writing, Communication, Chat Gpt, Writing Advice, How To Write, Writing Guide, Writing, Writing Lessons, David Perell, How I Write, Podcast, Sam Altman Interview, Sam Altman Podcast, Sam Altman Note Taking, Sam Altman Y Combinator, Sam Altman Ai, Sam Altman Agi, How Sam Altman Uses Chatgpt, Openai Founder, Openai Ceo, How To Use Chatgpt, How To Write With Chatgpt, Super Intelligence, Llms, Future Of Writing, Paul Graham, Peter Thiel, Ycombinator, Y Combinator, Chatgpt, Chatgpt4, Chatgpt5, Openai Chatgpt, Openai, David Perell